CME E-Nano Futures Explained: NNQ, NES, N2K & NDOW Tickers, Tick Values, and Sizing

TLDR: CME Group's new E-nano Equity Index futures began trading today, August 24, 2026. There are four contracts: Nano Nasdaq-100 (NNQ), Nano S&P 500 (NES), Nano Russell 2000 (N2K), and Nano Dow (NDOW), each sized at 1/10 the corresponding Micro E-mini and 1/100 the corresponding E-mini. They don't make futures fractional, but they add a much finer rung to CME's existing E-mini → Micro sizing ladder, which matters for position sizing, scaling, and automated execution as much as it matters for small accounts.

Ultra Mega Trader · TradingView & NinjaTrader

Stop Executing Trades By Hand.

UMT Automator turns your TradingView or NinjaTrader strategy into automatic, hands-free execution — no code, no webhooks, no missed signals. Prefer a ready-made edge? Browse UMT's tested Strategies & Indicators built for both platforms.

Get the Automator Browse Strategies

Free 7-day trial on the Automator · No credit card required

What are CME E-nano futures?

E-nano Equity Index futures are a new CME Group product family covering the four major U.S. equity indexes. They launched for trading on August 24, 2026, alongside the existing E-mini and Micro E-mini contracts on the same indexes. They don't replace anything; they add a smaller denomination underneath the Micros.

Each E-nano contract is 1/10 the contract multiplier of its Micro E-mini counterpart, and 1/100 the multiplier of the full-size E-mini. CME also built in a clearing-level offset relationship: E-nano positions can be offset against opposing Micro E-mini positions at a 10:1 ratio, and against E-mini positions at 100:1.

The four new tickers: NNQ, NES, N2K, NDOW

These are CME's official Globex product codes. If you see other symbols circulating (some broker or charting platforms use their own internal codes), treat CME's own listing as the source of truth:

Don't confuse this family with CME's separate Spot-Quoted futures (QNDX, QSPX, QRTY, QDOW). Those are a different product line, quoted differently, and not the same as the E-nano contracts covered here.

NNQ vs MNQ vs NQ: a worked example

The Nasdaq-100 family makes the sizing relationship easiest to see:

• NQ (E-mini) = $20 per Nasdaq-100 point
• MNQ (Micro) = $2 per point
• NNQ (E-nano) = $0.20 per point

That means 1 NQ = 10 MNQ = 100 NNQ in directional exposure. For a 100-point Nasdaq-100 move:

• 1 NQ → $2,000
• 1 MNQ → $200
• 1 NNQ → $20

Because NNQ's minimum price increment is 0.50 index points, one NNQ tick is worth $0.10, which is half the tick value of MNQ's $0.50-per-tick increment, even though the contract itself is 1/10 the size. More on why that matters below.

Fractional-like position sizing (without technically being fractional)

The most useful way to think about E-nanos isn't "futures for beginners"; it's a new position-sizing denomination. You still trade whole contracts; there's no such thing as half an NNQ. But because 10 NNQ ≈ 1 MNQ in exposure, a trader can now approximate fractional Micro positions in 10% increments:

Previously, a trader who calculated an ideal exposure of "0.4 MNQ" had to round to 0 or 1 whole Micro contracts. With NNQ, that becomes 4 contracts, which is a much closer match to the calculated size.

What this means for scaling in and out

The same granularity applies to building and exiting positions. With MNQ alone, scaling a single Micro-equivalent position is essentially binary: flat, or one full contract. With NNQ, a trader can build a position in ten steps, from 1 to 10 NNQ, and unwind it the same way. That's useful for:

• Scaling strategies and averaging into a level
• Partial profit-taking
• Progressive entries as a setup confirms
• Volatility-adjusted or portfolio-balancing sizing
• Testing a strategy live with a smaller financial footprint before sizing up. See our 7-day plan for moving from paper to live automation

The tick-size caveat: NNQ isn't simply "MNQ ÷ 10"

It's tempting to treat E-nanos as a straight fractional slice of the Micro contract, but CME set the minimum tick size larger, in index points, than the corresponding Micro/E-mini:

• Nasdaq: NQ/MNQ tick = 0.25 points; NNQ tick = 0.50 points
• S&P 500: ES/MES tick = 0.25 points; NES tick = 0.50 points
• Russell 2000: RTY/M2K tick = 0.10 points; N2K tick = 0.20 points
• Dow: YM/MYM tick = 1 point; NDOW tick = 2 points

So while 10 NNQ carries roughly the same directional dollar exposure as 1 MNQ, the two contracts don't necessarily execute identically at the tick level. Treat the sizing relationship as a dollar-exposure equivalence, not a literal 1:1 mechanical clone. If you're automating entries and exits, it's worth understanding how order type affects fills on a new, thinner order book. See our breakdown of market vs. limit orders for automated trading.

Before you trade E-nanos: liquidity is unproven on day one

E-nano contracts share the same underlying index as their larger counterparts, but they trade in their own separate order books. Because these products launched today, there's no track record yet for volume, spread, or depth. Early trader discussion on launch morning has mentioned wider spreads and thinner off-hours liquidity, along with uneven broker/platform availability, but that's anecdotal, not verified market data, and shouldn't be treated as a conclusion about how E-nano liquidity will settle once trading matures.

Before sizing a real position in NNQ, NES, N2K, or NDOW, check current volume, bid/ask spread, and market depth for yourself rather than assuming it matches the Micro contract. This is exactly the kind of detail worth revisiting once the contracts have a real trading history. We'll update this article with volume and spread data at 30 and 90 days after launch.

E-nano trading hours

E-nano futures trade on the standard CME equity index schedule: Sunday 6:00 p.m. ET through Friday 5:00 p.m. ET, with the regular daily maintenance break from 5:00–6:00 p.m. ET (Sunday 5:00 p.m.–Friday 4:00 p.m. CT, maintenance 4:00–5:00 p.m. CT). That's essentially the same near round-the-clock access as the E-mini and Micro contracts. E-nanos are not a day-session-only product.

What is the current NNQ contract? (Expiration and month codes)

E-nano futures list on the standard quarterly cycle of March, June, September, and December, and CME initially lists the nearest two quarterly expirations. As of this article's publish date (August 2026), the listed contracts are the September and December 2026 expirations:

• NNQU6, NNQZ6 (Nano Nasdaq-100)
• NESU6, NESZ6 (Nano S&P 500)
• N2KU6, N2KZ6 (Nano Russell 2000)
• NDOWU6, NDOWZ6 (Nano Dow)

The letter denotes the contract month (U = September, Z = December) and the number denotes the year. All four are cash-settled against the Special Opening Quotation on the third Friday of the contract month. There is no physical delivery, consistent with the corresponding E-mini and Micro contracts.

How much margin do you need to trade NNQ?

We're not going to publish a single "$X to trade NNQ" figure, and you should be skeptical of any article that does on launch day. CME sets exchange margin requirements that move with market conditions, and brokers layer their own intraday and maintenance margin requirements on top of the exchange minimum, which can differ significantly by broker. Check your own broker's current NNQ/NES/N2K/NDOW margin requirement directly before trading; don't assume it's a clean 1/10 of the Micro contract's margin.

The same caution applies to commissions. E-nano trading costs don't scale down 10:1 with contract size, and the difference can be significant for scalpers and high-volume strategies. Below, we break down the currently published NNQ, NES, N2K, and NDOW commissions, CME transaction costs, NinjaTrader availability, and what 10 NNQ can actually cost compared with 1 MNQ.

NNQ Commissions and E-Nano Futures Trading Fees

Commission and fee figures below are current as of August 25, 2026, the day after E-nano futures began trading. Broker pricing changes without notice. Always confirm current rates directly with your broker before trading.

How much are NNQ commissions?

There's no single universal "NNQ commission," because the broker commission you pay is separate from the exchange, regulatory, and clearing fees charged on every futures trade regardless of broker. As of August 25, 2026, Interactive Brokers is the only major broker to explicitly publish a commission rate for NNQ, NES, N2K, and NDOW: $0.25 per contract per side at retail volume (up to 1,000 contracts/month), scaling down to $0.10 per contract per side above 20,000 contracts/month, with exchange and regulatory fees itemized separately on top. NinjaTrader's public commission schedule does not yet list E-nano contracts by name. The real all-in cost to trade one NNQ contract round-trip is the broker commission plus those exchange/regulatory fees combined, not the commission figure alone.

Broker commission vs. exchange/regulatory fees vs. all-in cost

Three separate line items make up what it actually costs to trade an E-nano contract, and traders searching "NNQ commission" are usually asking about the third one:

• Broker commission: what your broker charges for routing and executing the order. This is the number brokers advertise, and the only piece that varies significantly by broker or account plan.
• Exchange, regulatory, and clearing fees: set by CME Group, the NFA, and the clearing firm, and passed through by every broker. These sit largely outside any single broker's control.
• All-in round-trip cost: commission plus exchange/regulatory/clearing fees, doubled to cover both the entry and the exit. This is the number that actually determines whether a trade is profitable after costs.

A broker's advertised "$0.25 commission" is one input into the all-in cost, not the cost itself.

Interactive Brokers' published NNQ, NES, N2K and NDOW commission schedule

Interactive Brokers groups NNQ, NES, N2K, and NDOW together with its Spot-Quoted, E-nano, and E-micro futures under one tiered commission schedule. Per IBKR's published futures commission page:

IBKR states explicitly that these rates don't include exchange and regulatory fees. Those are itemized separately as pass-through charges "to offset exchange and regulatory fees paid by IBKR," in addition to the commission above. Most retail traders fall into the ≤1,000-contract tier, meaning $0.25 per contract per side ($0.50 round-trip in commission alone) is the realistic starting point for NNQ, NES, N2K, and NDOW at IBKR before exchange and regulatory fees are added.

What does CME's $0.70 figure for NNQ, NES, N2K and NDOW actually mean?

CME Group's UK PRIIPs Key Information Document (KID) cost-disclosure table lists a "Total Costs" figure of $0.70 for E-nano Nasdaq-100 (NNQ), E-nano S&P 500 (NES), E-nano Russell 2000 (N2K), and E-nano Dow (NDOW), dated 20 Aug 2026. CME's own page explains what this represents: "Transaction costs are based on the non-member fee for outright transactions executed on CME Globex." In other words, the $0.70 is CME's PRIIPs-mandated disclosure of the exchange's non-member Globex transaction fee for a round-trip trade, split evenly into entry and exit costs on CME's table. It is not a trader's total commission, and no individual broker sets it. It's a regulatory cost-disclosure figure, not a universal "$0.70 commission" every trader pays.

It's also not unique to E-nano contracts: the same PRIIPs table lists an identical $0.70 total-cost figure for the Micro E-mini S&P 500 (MES), Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 (MNQ), Micro E-mini Russell 2000 (M2K), and Micro E-mini Dow (MYM). E-nano contracts are 1/10 the size of these Micro contracts. That matters for the cost-scaling comparison below.

Has NinjaTrader published an NNQ, NES, N2K or NDOW commission rate?

As of August 25, 2026, NinjaTrader's publicly available commission schedule does not yet explicitly list NNQ, NES, N2K or NDOW. Searching NinjaTrader's live commissions table (last updated August 14, 2026, before the E-nano launch) for any of the four E-nano tickers returns no results, while MNQ, MES, M2K, and MYM continue to appear normally with their own itemized commission and exchange-fee rates. Do not assume the MNQ/MES commission rate applies to E-nano contracts until NinjaTrader publishes or confirms the rate. The comparison below shows why that assumption specifically would understate the real cost.

NNQ vs. MNQ Commissions: Do E-Nano Fees Scale Down 10:1?

CME confirms E-nanos are built at 1/10 the contract size of their corresponding Micro E-mini contracts: 10 NNQ ≈ the notional exposure of 1 MNQ, 10 NES ≈ 1 MES, 10 N2K ≈ 1 M2K, and 10 NDOW ≈ 1 MYM. It's tempting to assume transaction costs scale down the same way. They don't, and CME's own cost disclosures show why.

The exchange-fee component doesn't shrink with the contract

CME's PRIIPs "Total Costs" table shows NNQ and MNQ both at the identical $0.70 figure, as do NES/MES, N2K/M2K, and NDOW/MYM. The exchange transaction fee is charged per contract, not per dollar of notional exposure, so it stays flat in dollar terms even though the E-nano contract is worth 1/10 as much. CME's own "Reduction in Yield" (RIY) column expresses the same cost as a percentage of notional value and makes this explicit:

Every E-nano contract carries roughly 10x the exchange-fee cost of its Micro counterpart when measured against notional exposure: the same dollar fee is spread over one-tenth the exposure. That's arithmetic, not broker markup, and it holds before any broker commission is added on top.

Worked example: 10 NNQ vs. 1 MNQ, all-in round-trip cost

Using IBKR's published retail-tier commission ($0.25/contract/side for NNQ, and IBKR's standard $0.85/contract/side rate that applies to MNQ) alongside CME's $0.70 PRIIPs figure as a stand-in for exchange/regulatory fees:

• 1 MNQ, round-trip: commission $0.85 × 2 = $1.70, plus $0.70 exchange-fee benchmark = ≈$2.40 total
• 10 NNQ, round-trip (equivalent notional exposure): commission $0.25 × 2 × 10 = $5.00, plus $0.70 × 10 = $7.00 exchange-fee benchmark = ≈$12.00 total

For the same notional exposure, 10 NNQ contracts cost roughly 5x more all-in than 1 MNQ contract in this example. This is illustrative. It uses IBKR's published commission tier and CME's own PRIIPs figure as a proxy for exchange/regulatory fees, not IBKR's exact itemized exchange-fee pass-through, which IBKR does not publish as a flat dollar number. But it demonstrates the core point: commissions and fees do not scale down 10:1 just because contract exposure does.

That has real implications depending on how you trade:

• A trader using a handful of NNQ contracts for precise position sizing, such as 0.3 or 0.7 of an MNQ-equivalent position, trades a small number of contracts and absorbs a modest, one-time cost premium in exchange for sizing precision whole-Micro-contract increments can't offer.
• A trader scalping 10 NNQ contracts repeatedly instead of 1 MNQ pays that cost premium on every single round trip, and it compounds fast across dozens of trades a day. For high-frequency or scalping strategies, E-nano's finer sizing can come at a real, cumulative cost disadvantage versus simply trading the Micro contract.

FAQ: CME E-nano futures

What is the ticker for Nano Nasdaq futures?
NNQ.

What is the ticker for Nano S&P 500 futures?
NES.

What is the ticker for Nano Russell 2000 futures?
N2K.

What is the ticker for Nano Dow futures?
NDOW.

How many NNQ contracts equal one MNQ?
10 NNQ carries roughly the same contract-multiplier exposure as 1 MNQ (and 100 NNQ ≈ 1 NQ), though tick sizes differ between the two products.

How much is one NNQ tick worth?
$0.10 per contract. NNQ's minimum price increment is 0.50 Nasdaq-100 index points.

How much is one NNQ point worth?
$0.20 per contract.

When did NNQ launch?
August 24, 2026.

Is NNQ the same as QNDX?
No. QNDX is part of CME's separate Spot-Quoted futures family. NNQ is the E-nano Nasdaq-100 futures contract covered in this article.

Are E-nano futures good for beginners?
They lower the dollar amount per contract, which reduces the financial size of a single position, but futures still involve leverage and the potential to lose more than your initial margin. They're not inherently "safer," just smaller per contract.

How much is the commission on NNQ futures?
It depends on your broker. As of August 25, 2026, Interactive Brokers publishes $0.25 per contract per side for retail monthly volume (≤1,000 contracts), on top of separate exchange and regulatory fees. Other brokers set their own rates, and not all of them have published E-nano-specific pricing yet.

What are NinjaTrader's NNQ commissions?
As of August 25, 2026, NinjaTrader's public commission schedule does not explicitly list NNQ, NES, N2K, or NDOW. Don't assume the MNQ or MES rate carries over. Check NinjaTrader's commissions page directly before trading, since CME's own fee data shows exchange costs don't scale down with contract size.

Is NNQ cheaper to trade than MNQ?
Per contract, broker commissions on NNQ are typically lower in raw dollar terms than on MNQ (for example, IBKR's $0.25 vs. $0.85 per side). But per dollar of notional exposure, NNQ is more expensive to trade than MNQ, because exchange and regulatory fees are charged per contract rather than per dollar of exposure. Trading 10 NNQ to match 1 MNQ's exposure costs more all-in than trading the single MNQ contract.

How much does it cost to trade one NNQ contract?
All-in round-trip cost equals broker commission (both sides) plus exchange, regulatory, and clearing fees (both sides). Using IBKR's published $0.25/side commission plus CME's $0.70 PRIIPs figure as an illustrative benchmark, one NNQ round trip runs roughly $0.50 (commission) + $0.70 (exchange-fee benchmark) ≈ $1.20 before any broker-specific adjustments to the exchange-fee pass-through.

Are NNQ commissions one-tenth of MNQ commissions?
No. While NNQ's contract size is 1/10 of MNQ's, neither broker commissions nor exchange fees scale down at that same 10:1 ratio. CME's own PRIIPs cost disclosure shows an identical $0.70 exchange-fee figure for both NNQ and MNQ. As a percentage of notional exposure, the E-nano contract's exchange-fee cost therefore runs roughly 10x higher than the Micro's, not one-tenth.

What are the commissions for NES, N2K and NDOW?
Interactive Brokers applies the same tiered schedule to NES, N2K, and NDOW as it does to NNQ: $0.25 per contract per side at ≤1,000 contracts/month, stepping down to $0.20, $0.15, and $0.10 per side at higher volume tiers, plus separate exchange and regulatory fees. As of August 25, 2026, no other major broker has published E-nano-specific commission rates for these four contracts.

Where E-nanos fit for automated and systematic trading

Smaller contract increments create more room for granular position sizing in an automated strategy. A strategy that previously had to choose between zero and one MNQ can, in principle, express the same directional exposure in ten NNQ increments instead, which is useful for scaling entries, exits, and volatility-adjusted position sizing in a systematic approach, provided your broker and TradingView list the new symbols for trading.

Bringing It Back to Ultra Mega Trader

Whatever contract size you land on, whether E-mini, Micro, or now E-nano, the actual hard part of trading rarely comes down to the exchange giving you a smaller multiplier. It's execution: getting your TradingView strategy's signals into your broker consistently, without manual clicking, missed fills, or hesitation.

That's the problem the UMT Automator for TradingView is built for. It watches your TradingView strategy or indicator signals and automates order execution through your own logged-in broker connection. It requires no webhooks, API keys, or code. Futures brokers already supported include Tradovate, AMP Futures, and NinjaTrader. Whether you're running a discretionary approach that now scales in 10% increments with NNQ, or a fully systematic strategy that needs every entry and exit executed the same way every time, that's the same automation layer either way.

To be direct about where this stands today: we're not claiming NNQ, NES, N2K, or NDOW support inside Ultra Mega Trader on day one of these contracts existing. That depends on your broker and TradingView listing the new symbols first. If you're already automating E-mini or Micro Nasdaq, S&P, Russell, or Dow strategies with the Automator, the underlying automation works the same way regardless of which size contract your strategy trades.

Sources

This article was researched primarily from CME Group's own E-nano Equity Index futures materials: the E-nano product page, the official E-nano FAQ (contract specs, tick sizes, trading hours, settlement, expiration cycle), and the CME Globex launch notice. Early liquidity commentary referenced in the "before you trade" section is anecdotal trader discussion, not CME data, and is flagged as such above.

Commission and fee figures were verified against CME Group's UK PRIIPs cost-disclosure table, Interactive Brokers' published futures commission schedule, and NinjaTrader's live commissions table, all checked August 25, 2026.

This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not personalized financial or investment advice, and it is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any futures contract. Futures trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors; you can lose more than your initial margin. Contract specifications, margin requirements, and product availability are set by CME Group and your broker and are subject to change. Verify current details directly with CME Group and your broker before trading.